Home / Featured / Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie refuses to apologise for trans women comments

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie refuses to apologise for trans women comments

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie has said she has nothing to apologise for over her remarks about trans women, and that she has always thought trans women are women.

Speaking on Channel 4 news earlier this month, Adichie was asked if “trans women are women,” and responded: “…trans women are trans women.”

The 39-year-old added that trans women could not be placed in the same category as cis women because they had experienced male privilege.

The comments produced anger from the LGBT community, but in Washington recently, the author of We Should All Be Feminists refused to say sorry, stating that she had been misunderstood.

“I didn’t apologise because I don’t think I have anything to apologise for,” she said.

“From the very beginning, I think it’s been quite clear that there’s no way I could possibly say that trans women are not women. It’s the sort of thing to me that’s obvious, so I start from that obvious premise.

“Of course they are women, but in talking about feminism and gender and all of that, it’s important for us to acknowledge the differences in experience of gender. That’s really what my point is.”

She told a sold-out audience at an event created by bookshop Politics & Prose that a culture of “language orthodoxy” was to blame for the backlash.

“Had I said, ‘a cis woman is a cis woman, and a trans woman is a trans woman’, I don’t think I would get all the crap that I’m getting, but that’s actually really what I was saying,” she explained.

“But because ‘cis’ is not a part of my vocabulary – it just isn’t – it really becomes about language and the reason I find that troubling is to insist that you have to speak in a certain way and use certain expressions, otherwise we cannot have a conversation, can close up debate.

“And if we can’t have conversations, we can’t have progress.”

Adichie said that “gender is about what we experience,” and therefore the idea that cis and trans women were the same was “like the idea of colour-blindness”.

She said this concept was “a really hollow idea that if we say we don’t see colour, then somehow all the oppressions will disappear. That’s not the case.

“I think there were people who felt I was somehow making a point about the Oppression Olympics: you haven’t suffered enough. It’s not at all that. It’s simply to see that if we can acknowledge there are differences, then we can better honestly talk about things.”

Host of the BBC Radio 4 Woman’s Hour, Dame Jenni Murray, recently suggested that trans women are not “real women”, speaking in a similar way about trans women having male privilege.

Another feminist speaker, Germaine Greer, also faced criticism ahead of appearing at an International Women’s Day event in Brighton for her trans-exclusionary rhetoric.

About shakespeareanwalter

Walt Shakes(@Walt_Shakes) is an award-winning Nigerian writer, poet and veteran blogger. He is a lover of the written word. the faint whiff of nature, the flashing vista of movies, the warmth of companionship and the happy sound of laughter.

Check Also


You know what they say about the past? They say let it go and forgive ...


  1. She is a writer. It is in her job description to make sure she communicates what she wants to say.

    Either she did that, in which case, she deserves the backlash.

    Or she didn’t do that, in which case she should apologise for not communicating clearly.

    “but that’s actually really what I was saying,” she explained.”

    No, it really is not what you were saying. And you haven’t convinced me that this is what you intended to say because, when one makes a mistake, then the proper thing to do is apologise. not blame those listening for hearing it wrong.

  2. How come nobody is talking about the ‘they enjoyed male privilege’ part of her speech as if every male privilege has a positive connotation?
    When we were younger, I couldn’t fall sick and act it as my dad and the family by extension see it as being weak and feminine. This is just one example. Countless others abound.

    Note: I’m not denying I’d privileges as male and especially as first son but shouldn’t such discussions be more balanced?

    • shakespeareanwalter

      For once I agree with you. There’s a tendency for feminism to dismiss male privilege as all good and all positive. These conversations have to be balanced and not skewed to favour one side entirely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: